Jump to content

Hardy confused from lack of extension talk


SerenityNow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 339
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He's confused about the lack of extension talks when he's missing half the games with injuries?.
That's much more clear than you first post lol. He was confused and I was confused.

A lot of confusion.

Oo

[video=youtube;miZWYmxr8XE]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the issue has anything to do with health. At last not Hardy's. I think it has more to do with Manny's health and the likely hood of him moving to SS. Hardy wants assurances that he will remain at SS for the duration of an extension and the O's aren't ready to give them yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the issue has anything to do with health. At last not Hardy's. I think it has more to do with Manny's health and the likely hood of him moving to SS. Hardy wants assurances that he will remain at SS for the duration of an extension and the O's aren't ready to give them yet.

I think that is part of it.

I think the development of Schoop, the acquisition of Lombardozzi, the development fo Flahaerty, and the commitment of 13-15M per year for 3 or 4 years are all involved in the O's thinking. The O's management like Hardy but are considering what is the best move considering the younger, cheaper players they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be crystal clear about this: the way Dan Duquette is handling this is low class, and it stinks. And it's not the first time, and I'm getting sick of it.

If Duquette doesn't want to discuss an extension with Hardy right now, that's fine. If he doesn't want to extend him at all, fine. If he wants to wait until after the season to decide, fine. If he wants to postpone to the All Star Break, fine. All of that is Duquette's prerogative.

But what he CAN'T do is WHAT he IS doing -- make several public statements that he's going to try to extend Hardy this spring, and then have no communication with Hardy's agent about what is going on, leaving Hardy to guess and speculate and twist in the wind.

He more or less did the same thing with Reynolds, with Roberts, and to some extent, Jim Johnson. In each case, he made some public statements indicating some interest in retaining the player, then didn't even have the courtesy to call the player's agent to tell them his intentions or his timetable.

I understand that GMs play poker, and you can't take everything they say at face value, but they are dealing with human beings here, and if DD does this too often, with respected key members of the team, the entire clubhouse will take note. JJ Hardy signed a team friendly extension before, was forthright then and now about wanting to stay with the club, and he deserves communication and honesty, at a minimum.

What goes around comes around, Dan. Just wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duquette's issue is he likes to sit in the middle of the road and wait until the last minute to make decisions. All sitting in the middle of the road gets you is run over. On Roberts and Johnson it looks okay. Ubaldo..not so much.

Honestly, Hardy should not be concerned where he is playing if he gets paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All it takes to stop the extension talk is one market-overpriced, I won't budge from this number from an agent, aka Jim Johnson situation all over again.

Since we don't know what Hardy's agent proposed, but that it could have killed the deal. Or at least forced the Orioles to wait to see how the younger players do before making that decision.

Until you know what's what from both sides, it's wrong to criticize DD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be crystal clear about this: the way Dan Duquette is handling this is low class, and it stinks. And it's not the first time, and I'm getting sick of it.

If Duquette doesn't want to discuss an extension with Hardy right now, that's fine. If he doesn't want to extend him at all, fine. If he wants to wait until after the season to decide, fine. If he wants to postpone to the All Star Break, fine. All of that is Duquette's prerogative.

But what he CAN'T do is WHAT he IS doing -- make several public statements that he's going to try to extend Hardy this spring, and then have no communication with Hardy's agent about what is going on, leaving Hardy to guess and speculate and twist in the wind.

He more or less did the same thing with Reynolds, with Roberts, and to some extent, Jim Johnson. In each case, he made some public statements indicating some interest in retaining the player, then didn't even have the courtesy to call the player's agent to tell them his intentions or his timetable.

I understand that GMs play poker, and you can't take everything they say at face value, but they are dealing with human beings here, and if DD does this too often, with respected key members of the team, the entire clubhouse will take note. JJ Hardy signed a team friendly extension before, was forthright then and now about wanting to stay with the club, and he deserves communication and honesty, at a minimum.

What goes around comes around, Dan. Just wait and see.

I think this is company policy that comes from the top, not necessarily DD's preferred way of handling the situation. Angelos has dealt with many key members of the organization this way, including Davey Johnson and Ray Miller. Now, it's Hardy's turn. While I don't want the O's to re-sign Hardy, I do think that misleading him in this way could come back to haunt them, as Hardy is a very influential member of the team. They all will remember what happens here. I think the O's should announce that they will revisit the question after the season so JJ isn't distracted by the (lack of) talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hardy's extention boils down to one thing-Flaherty. They need to see alot of him this year to make any decisions about Hardy. If Flaherty is ready for prime time, then you let Hardy go, giving you an infield of Davis, Schoop, Flaherty and Machado with Lombo as your UTL. Or you only give Hardy the QO and if he signs it, you take him and platoon Flaherty and Schoop. But if Flaherty is nothing more than a UTL, then you do everything you can to resign Hardy at a reasonable price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup,seems like contract extension talks seem to get conflicting statements. Remember when Duquette said he has talked to Davis about an extension and he said it was news to him. I think it will be interesting to see the fan reaction if both Hardy and Markakis left this year and Wieters and Davis the next. I guess it all depends on the Orioles record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...